|
Oregon Scientific DS6688-R 3MP ThinCam Digital Camera (Red) | 
 enlarge | Brand: Oregon Scientific
Category: Photography
List Price: $149.95
Buy New: $89.95
You Save: $60.00 (40%)
Rating:  14 reviews
Sales Rank: 40057
Color: Red
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Batteries Included: No
Floppy Disk Drive: None
Optical Zoom: 1
Display Size: 1.5
Minimum Focal Length: 8.34
Clothing Size: 3.0 MP
Size: 3.0 MP
Shipping Weight (lbs): 2
Dimensions (in): 5.4 x 8.8 x 3
MPN: DCF0208011413001
Model: DS6688
UPC: 734811212429
EAN: 0734811212429
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | 3.1-megapixel sensor captures enough detail to create photo-quality 10-by-13-inch prints | | • | Fixed-focus optical zoom with 2x digital zoom | | • | 1.5-inch TFT LCD monitor | | • | Store images on 16MB of internal memory or on separately sold Secure Digital (SD) cards | | • | Powered by 2 AAA-size batteries (alkaline included, rechargeables recommended) |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
This micro-size digital camera takes great 3.0 megapixel pictures anytime, anywhere. It is small enough to carry in your pocket, has a built-in flash, 2x digital zoom and a 1.5" color TFT screen for great quality pictures on-the-go.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 9 more reviews...
 Total Junk Camera February 8, 2008
Edward J. Ricino (Scranton, PA USA)
I bought this to take pictures of household construction work, Torture to work the tiny joystick button. Kills your batteries after about 3-4 flashes, pictures are of poor quality on any setting, distance and or set up once you figure out how to work the buttons. I read some reviews on this that stated this was a poor camera, but I figured for what I was going to use it for why not. Wrong choice, DO NOT waste a single penny on this item, if someone try's to give you one for free, they do not like you. How a product this bad actually made it into production is ridiculous. Just to rehash "DO NOT BUY THIS CAMERA" it is total garbage.
digital camera December 12, 2007
Clair D. Strutt (Orlando, Florida)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This camera broke after 30days.
the flash refused to work even after changing batteries, changing battery brands...
Not worth it! October 30, 2007
Jessica Williams
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
It's cheap, but that's where the positives end. Very poor picture quality just makes the size meaningless. Yeah, it's very small and lightweight, but the idea of a camera is to take pictures...and in several different conditions, the pics we took with this camera were grainy. No matter ho wmuch light we had, still grainy. Very disappointing. I used it for a while, then sold it!
Horrible September 24, 2007
J. Belfus (Philadelphia)
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
Don't buy this. I saved up for it during my freshman year of college because I really wanted a camera and I was so disapointed when I received this. I recently gave it to my 8 year old brother to play with. Its too crappy to pawn off to someone on ebay. Dont waste your money. Eats batteries before you can even take a picture and the flash feature is terrible, along with the quality of the pictures.
This product sucks!!!! August 11, 2007
L. Ryan
2 out of 4 found this review helpful
Do not..I repeat... DO NOT waste your money on this thing..it is garbage!!!! you have to carry around a stack of batteries just to take more than 5 pictures. There is a delayed second flash so unless you tell everyone your taking pictures of to wait for both flashes your going to get a lot of blurry faces. The picture quality is disgusting and impossible to edit. You can't take any close up pictures with the flash on because all you would see is hair and eyes.. I recently used it at a wedding and tried to take decent pictures from 3 rows away but even that failed to produce anything nice. When I took some pictures outdoors everybody including the background was blue...please save your self the frustration and opt for a more better quality camera..
|
|
|
|
| |
